My view on the crazy world today
Major problem in a Reserve unit
Published on October 16, 2004 By Dysmas In Current Events
WASHINGTON (Oct. 16) - Relatives of soldiers who refused to deliver supplies in Iraq say the troops considered the mission too dangerous, in part because their vehicles were in poor shape.

The Army is investigating up to 19 reservist members of a platoon that is part of the 343rd Quartermaster Company, based in Rock Hill, S.C. The unit delivers food, water and fuel on trucks in combat zones.

Convoys in Iraq are frequently subject to ambushes and roadside bombings.

Some of the troops' safety concerns were being addressed, military officials said. But a coalition spokesman in Baghdad said "a small number of the soldiers involved chose to express their concerns in an inappropriate manner, causing a temporary breakdown in discipline."

Teresa Hill of Dothan, Ala., who said her daughter, Amber McClenny, was among in the platoon, received a phone message from her early Thursday morning saying they had been detained by U.S. military authorities.

"This is a real, real, big emergency," McClenny said in her message. "I need you to contact someone. I mean, raise pure hell."

McClenny said in her message that her platoon had refused to go on a fuel-hauling convoy to Taji, north of Baghdad. "We had broken down trucks, non-armored vehicles and, um, we were carrying contaminated fuel. They are holding us against our will. We are now prisoners," she said.

Hill said she was later contacted by Spc. Tammy Reese in Iraq, who was calling families of the detainees.


Talk About It


· Chat | Post Messages
· Top News Boards

"She told me (Amber) was being held in a tent with armed guards," said Hill, who spoke with her daughter Friday afternoon after her release. Her daughter said they are facing punishment ranging from a reprimand to a charge of mutiny.

The incident was first reported Friday by The Clarion-Ledger newspaper in Jackson, Miss. Family members told the newspaper that several platoon members had been confined, but the military did not confirm that.

A commanding general has ordered the unit to undergo a "safety-maintenance stand down," during which it will conduct no further missions as the unit's vehicles are inspected, the military said.

On Wednesday, 19 members of the platoon did not show up for a scheduled 7 a.m. meeting in Tallil, in southeastern Iraq, to prepare for the fuel convoy's departure a few hours later, the military statement said.

"An initial report indicated that some of the 19 soldiers (not all) refused to participate in the convoy as directed," the statement said.



AP
Army Reserve Sgt. Larry O. McCook was detained, his family said.

The mission was ultimately carried out by other soldiers from the 343rd, which has at least 120 soldiers, the military said.

Staff Sgt. Christopher Stokes, a 37-year-old chemical engineer from Charlotte, N.C., went to Iraq with the 343rd but had to come home because of an injury. He said reservists were given inferior equipment and tensions in the company had been building since they were deployed in February.

"It wasn't really safe," he said. "The vehicles are not all that up to par anyway. The armor that they have is homemade. It's not really armor. It's like little steel rails."

A whole unit refusing to go on a mission in a war zone would be a significant breach of military discipline. The military statement said the incident "isolated" and called the 343rd an experienced unit that performed honorable service in nine months in Iraq.

U.S. military officials said the commanding general of the 13th Corps Support Command., Brig. Gen. James E. Chambers, had appointed his deputy, Col. Darrell Roll, to investigate. An investigative team under Roll is in Tallil, questioning soldiers about the incident, the military said.

"Preliminary findings indicate that there were several contributing factors that led to the late convoy incident and alleged refusal to participate by some soldiers," the military said. "It would be inappropriate to discuss those factors while the investigation continues."

Separately, the commander of the 300th Area Support Group, listed on a military Web site as Col. Pamela Adams, has ordered a criminal inquiry to determine if any soldiers committed crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and, if so, whether disciplinary measures are warranted.

The platoon has troops from Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Mississippi and South Carolina, said Hill.

Associated Press writers Samira Jafari in Montgomery, Ala., and Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, S.C., contributed to this report.

Comments
on Oct 16, 2004
Sounds more like Mutiny.
If you recieve an Illegal oreder as opposed to a dumb order, you are required to refuse it. It isn't easy but can be done.
Oh yeah, this is why a draft would be such a good idea...right.
on Oct 16, 2004
I think it sounds much like mutiny to me as well. Your correct in that Military Law provides protection for service members to refuse to obey an ILLEGAL order, but NOT an order that you just don't like. They said the "Mission was to dangerous?" Ok, which mission isnt dangerous and how about the soldiers that were counting on the supplies they were to provide? I imagine it put them at an even greater risk.
They said their "vehicles were in poor shape" thats a matter for the Chain of Command to determine and im sure they took any maintanice issues into account.
I think the mother stated it perfectly ""This is a real, real, big emergency," McClenny said in her message. "I need you to contact someone. I mean, raise pure hell."
Yes it IS a real big emergency, soldiers who refuse orders, particulary in a combat zone put their lifes and the lifes of those they support at risk. And "I need you to contact someone. I mean, raise pure hell." Yup, their actions were totally out of line, Mutiniy yes and bordering on treason. All in all, as a soldier who served more than a year in Iraq, this event bothers me, to vastly understate it. If we did not recieve our LOGPACs with the supplies we needed, we would be in a very dangerous situation. Not enough water, food, ammo and so on. Its a very bad situation that should be dealt with swiftly, and to the letter of the law, to show that the armed forces will NOT tolerate any breach of discipline and that any that happens will be dealt with accordingly.
on Oct 16, 2004
Immediate big chicken dinners, revocation of all benefits and six months making big rocks little ones.
on Oct 16, 2004
Should be a BCD if they disobeyed orders, But it won't be there has already been too much media coverage for that . There was even an article in my dinky little home town newspaper today.
on Oct 17, 2004
I agree, unfortunatly I fear that you may be right. To much media coverage tends to have a strange effect on legal processes. Most of the time it gets in the way I think.
on Oct 17, 2004
Prison time. Now.
on Oct 17, 2004
Mutiny in a combat situation brings what punishment? Possibly the CMH. (Coffin with metal handles) after the firing squad.
Grey, remind me to look in rocks and shoals at work tomorrow.